Individualistic
Posted on: July 21, 2008
One might think individualistic is selfish, the other might regard it as human nature. Me? I can’t even define individualistic, let alone giving any comments.
People need friends (normal, close, boy/girl friends) to have a sense of belonging and being needed, yet when it comes to benefits, who does not think for himself first? Virtually no one. Some claim to be your friends, talking lame stuff with each other, just to realize themselves in need of you most of the time. Once you’re no more beneficial to the so-called “friends”, you’re categorized as strangers. Don’t accuse them, your behaviour is not of a difference.
What do you say? Because they are not true/close friends. Ahh, how do you recognize such friends? Physically and emotionally close? This standard is questionable to me. Take a look at bgr, physical closeness- more than enough, emotional closeness- supposedly since you tend (or try/pretend) to share everything with your partner. How sure you are that your lover is not thinking for his/herself first? How sure you are that he/she does not act in his/her favor? Sad as it is, when you realize even the one(s) you trust the most and even want to locate him/her at a superior position in your life just simply do not care for you or limit his/her care to a fair level. Don’t be disappointed, your lover is human and he/she needs to protect his/herself. Lesson to be learnt, do not expect too much and be prepared to do everything yourself, if anything turn wrong, it’s your fault.
You might argue that when people mistreat you, it’s obviously people’s fault. Be practical, who is the one that let people cheat, who is the one that expected too much just to get disappointed eventually? Don’t blame them, not that they want to frustrate you, they accidentially forget your benefits since yours either crash or not related to theirs. It is your stupidity that kill you.
For memory's sake 
Leave a comment